Ranking – IronTract Challenge

The table shows round 2 submissions, ranked by area under the ROC curve (AUC) on the validation data. The AUC is computed for false positive rates in the [0, 0.3] range, hence the achievable AUC scores are in [0.045, 0.3].

Sub
  IDAUCTeamDataOrientation
  reconTractographyPost-processingRound 1?
26691DSICanales-Rodríguez 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
26591DSICanales-Rodríguez
  2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
2572HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
25541HCPCanales-Rodríguez
  2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
25284DSITran 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
25272HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
25172HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
25031HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
24842HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
24842DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
24561HCPCanales-Rodríguez
  2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
24551HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
24271DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
23382DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
23382HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
23164HCPTran 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
22863HCPJeurissen 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
22751DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
22522DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
22522HCPTournier 2007Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
22494DSITran 2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
22324HCPTran 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
222113HCPTournier 2007Global probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
21966HCPWu 2019Local deterministicAnatomical ROIsY
21677HCPJeurissen 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsY
21634HCPDhollander 2019Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
21534HCPTran 2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
21124DSITran 2015Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
209113HCPTournier 2007Global probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
20667HCPJeurissen 2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
20164HCPTran 2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
20083HCP
  
  Jeurissen 2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingY
19922DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
1994HCPDhollander 2019Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
19525HCPTournier 2007Global deterministicSpatial smoothingY
19372DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
18554DSITran 2015Local probabilisticSpatial smoothingN
18392DSIWedeen 2005Local probabilisticAnatomical ROIsN
174611HCPYeh 2010Local deterministicAnatomical ROIsY
170411HCPYeh 2010Local deterministicSpatial smoothingY
16026HCPWu 2019Local deterministicSpatial smoothingY
151812HCPTournier 2007Local deterministicSpatial smoothingN
12258HCPYeh 2010Local deterministicAnatomical ROIsY
11928DSIYeh 2010Local deterministicAnatomical ROIsY
11814DSI
  
  Guo 2020Local deterministicAnatomical ROIsN
11758HCPYeh 2010Local deterministicSpatial smoothingY
1168DSIYeh 2010Local deterministicSpatial smoothingY
095414HCP
  
  Guo 2020Local deterministicAnatomical ROIsN

Sub ID	AUC	Team	Data	Orientation recon	Tractography	Post-processing	Round 1?
63	0.2669	1	DSI	Canales-Rodríguez 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
61	0.2659	1	DSI	Canales-Rodríguez 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
19	0.257	2	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
7	0.2554	1	HCP	Canales-Rodríguez 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
85	0.2528	4	DSI	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
17	0.2527	2	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
16	0.2517	2	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
6	0.2503	1	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
14	0.2484	2	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
71	0.2484	2	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
5	0.2456	1	HCP	Canales-Rodríguez 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
4	0.2455	1	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
62	0.2427	1	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
75	0.2338	2	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
18	0.2338	2	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
30	0.2316	4	HCP	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
23	0.2286	3	HCP	Jeurissen 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
60	0.2275	1	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
72	0.2252	2	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
15	0.2252	2	HCP	Tournier 2007	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
83	0.2249	4	DSI	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
31	0.2232	4	HCP	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
53	0.2221	13	HCP	Tournier 2007	Global probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
37	0.2196	6	HCP	Wu 2019	Local deterministic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
41	0.2167	7	HCP	Jeurissen 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
29	0.2163	4	HCP	Dhollander 2019	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
27	0.2153	4	HCP	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
84	0.2112	4	DSI	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
52	0.2091	13	HCP	Tournier 2007	Global probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
40	0.2066	7	HCP	Jeurissen 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
28	0.2016	4	HCP	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
22	0.2008	3	HCP	Jeurissen 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	Y
70	0.1992	2	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
26	0.199	4	HCP	Dhollander 2019	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
33	0.1952	5	HCP	Tournier 2007	Global deterministic	Spatial smoothing	Y
73	0.1937	2	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
82	0.1855	4	DSI	Tran 2015	Local probabilistic	Spatial smoothing	N
74	0.1839	2	DSI	Wedeen 2005	Local probabilistic	Anatomical ROIs	N
49	0.1746	11	HCP	Yeh 2010	Local deterministic	Anatomical ROIs	Y
48	0.1704	11	HCP	Yeh 2010	Local deterministic	Spatial smoothing	Y